HOUSTON, TEXAS — (Marketwired) — 08/09/13 — Caza Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Caza” or the “Company”) (TSX: CAZ)(AIM: CAZA), is pleased to provide its unaudited financial and operational results for the three-months ended June 30, 2013.
Unaudited Second Quarter Financial Results
Second Quarter Recent Events
This initial drilling phase may be adjusted as mutually agreed between the Company and Apollo.
(i)Roja and Madera are operated by OXY USA Inc., and Lynch is operated by Mewbourne Oil Company.
Operational updates regarding the properties listed above will be provided to the market as appropriate, and the current status of each is provided below:
W. Michael Ford, Chief Executive Officer commented:
“We are very pleased with operations on the various wells we have drilling, producing or being completed in the Bone Spring play. We have recently been successful in enhancing some of our historical production in Wharton County, Texas, through workover operations. These operations coupled with bringing new Bone Spring wells online in the very near future, and continuing to do so throughout the remainder of 2013, should begin to be reflected by improved production and cash flow figures in the next quarter.
“Our current financial numbers are still being skewed from the sale of the San Jacinto property, which results in a negative impact on the comparative figures from 2012, that may continue through the end of Q3 (2013), which is when San Jacinto was sold last year. Despite this, the Company is on track to replace and surpass losses from San Jacinto in very short order and continue this upward trend with the Company–s current sustained drilling program continuing to boost production and cash flows and enhance reserves and shareholder value into the foreseeable future.
“Along these lines, we are happy to be drilling at Gateway and finalizing the completions on the OXY operated Madera wells and at Copperline on the Company operated Caza Ridge 14 State #4 well. We are excited to get these wells online and producing in the very near future. The Caza Ridge well appears to be a very good well, and we look forward to updating the market once initial rates for oil and natural gas are established. Also, our recent lease acquisition has improved the Company–s acreage position in the Bone Spring play and has increased our net position in the play to approximately 4,700 acres with an estimated 270 drilling locations.”
Copies of the Company–s unaudited financial statements for the second quarter ended June 30, 2013, and the accompanying management–s discussion and analysis are available on SEDAR at and the Company–s website at .
About Caza
Caza is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of hydrocarbons in the following regions of the United States of America through its subsidiary, Caza Petroleum, Inc.: Permian Basin (West Texas and Southeast New Mexico) and Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast (on-shore).
The Toronto Stock Exchange has neither approved nor disapproved the information contained herein.
In accordance with AIM Rules – Guidance Note for Mining, Oil and Gas Companies, the information contained in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Anthony B. Sam, Vice President Operations of Caza who is a Petroleum Engineer and a member of The Society of Petroleum Engineers.
ADVISORY STATEMENT
Information in this news release that is not current or historical factual information may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of securities laws. Such information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “schedule”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “project”, “predict”, “potential”, “intend”, “could”, “might”, “should”, “believe”, “develop”, “test”, “anticipation”, “appears” and similar expressions. In particular, information regarding the depth, timing and location of future drilling, the initial drilling phase, completion operations, intended production testing, well optimization, future production rates, reserves or cash flow, and the Company–s future working interests and net revenue interests in properties contained in this news release constitutes forward-looking information within the meaning of securities laws.
Implicit in this information, are assumptions regarding the success and timing of drilling operations, rig availability, projected revenue and expenses and well performance. These assumptions, although considered reasonable by the Company at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect. Readers are cautioned that actual future operations, operating results and economic performance of the Company are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including general economic, market and business conditions and could differ materially from what is currently expected as set out above. In addition, the geotechnical analysis and engineering to be conducted in respect of certain wells may not be complete. Future flow rates from wells may vary, perhaps materially, and wells may prove to be technically or economically unviable. Any future flow rates will be subject to the risks and uncertainties set out herein.
For more exhaustive information on these risks and uncertainties you should refer to the Company–s most recently filed annual information form which is available at and the Company–s website at . You should not place undue importance on forward-looking information and should not rely upon this information as of any other date. While we may elect to, we are under no obligation and do not undertake to update this information at any particular time except as may be required by securities laws.
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
The term boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion of six thousand cubic feet per one barrel is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the well head.
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
(1) All options and warrants have been excluded from the diluted loss per share computation as they are anti-dilutive.
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1. Basis of Presentation
Caza Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Caza” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of British Columbia on June 9, 2006 for the purposes of acquiring shares of Caza Petroleum, Inc. (“Caza Petroleum”). The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in the exploration for and the development, production and acquisition of, petroleum and natural gas reserves. The Company–s common shares are listed for trading on the TSX (symbol “CAZ”) and AIM stock exchanges (symbol “CAZA”). The corporate headquarters of the Company is located at 10077 Grogan–s Mill Road, Suite 200, The Woodlands, Texas 77380 and the registered office of the Company is located at Suite 1700, Park Place, 666 Burrard Street Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8.
Caza–s functional and presentational currency is the United States (“U.S.”) dollar as the majority of its transactions are denominated in the currency.
The condensed consolidated financial statements (the “Financial Statements”) were prepared in accordance with IAS 34 – Interim Financial Reporting using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).
These Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company–s audited annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2012, which outline the Company–s significant accounting policies in Note 2 thereto, as well as the Company–s critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty, which have been applied consistently in these Financial Statements. The note disclosure requirements of annual consolidated financial statements provide additional disclosures to that required for interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
These Financial Statements were approved for issuance by the Board of Directors on August 8, 2013.
Changes in Accounting Policies
As disclosed in the December 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2013, Caza adopted IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements”, IFRS 11 “Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12 “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities”, and the amendments to IAS 28 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.”
There were no changes to the consolidated financial statements or the consolidation process as a result of adoption of IFRS 10. IFRS 11 classifies interests in joint arrangements as joint ventures or joint operations depending on the rights and obligations of the parties in the arrangement. Caza performed a review of interests in joint arrangements and concluded that shared wells operate as joint operations and accordingly there is no change in the accounting for these assets as a result of adoption of this standard. As a result, there were no changes as a result of the adoption of IFRS 12 as well.
Furthermore Caza was also required to adopt IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurements,” amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements,” amendments to IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures.” There were no material changes as a result of the adoption of these standards.
2. Exploration and evaluation assets (“E&E”)
During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company added $7,689,284 of exploration and evaluation costs to E&E relating to the Lennox 33 State #2H and Caza Ridge 14 State #4H wells drilled in the Bone Spring play in New Mexico. The Company also transferred $4,984,334 to the Petroleum and natural gas properties and equipment relating to the Lennox 33 State #2H well that was completed during the second quarter of 2013. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 the Company expensed $740,677 associated with the expiration of leasehold costs.
3. Petroleum and natural gas properties and equipment
Future development costs of proved undeveloped reserves of $43,388,000 were included in the depletion calculation at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company did not note any indications of impairment as at June 30, 2013.
There were no impairment indicators as of June 30, 2013. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment of $2,688,506 primarily due to changes in the estimates of expected future natural gas prices used in determining the fair value. The March 31, 2012 impairment was recognized using a 16% discount rate.
4. Decommissioning Liabilities
The following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amount of the obligation associated with the retirement of petroleum and natural gas properties:
The undiscounted amount of cash flows, required over the estimated reserve life of the underlying assets, to settle the obligation, adjusted for inflation, is estimated at $1,379,989 (December 31, 2012 – $1,415,507). The obligation was calculated using a risk free discount rate of 2.5 percent (2012 – 2.5 percent) and an inflation rate of 3 percent (2012 – 3 percent). It is expected that this obligation will be funded from general Company resources at the time the costs are incurred with the majority of costs expected to occur between 2013 and 2030.
5. Related Party Transactions
The aggregate amount of expenditures made to related parties:
Singular Oil & Gas Sands, LLC (“Singular”) is a related party as it is a company under common control with Zoneplan Limited, which is a significant shareholder of Caza.
Singular participates in the drilling of the Matthys McMillan Gas Unit #2 and the O B Ranch #1 and 2 wells located in Wharton County, Texas. Under the terms of that agreement, Singular paid 14.01% of the drilling costs through completion to earn a 10.23% net revenue interest on the Matthys McMillan Gas Unit #2 well and paid 12.5% of the drilling costs to earn a 6.94% net revenue interest on the O B Ranch #1 well. Under the terms of the agreement of the O B Ranch #2 Singular paid 9.375% of the drilling costs to earn approximately 6.8% net revenue interest. This participation was in the normal course of Caza–s business and on the same terms and conditions to those of other joint interest partners. Singular owes the Company $23,195 in joint interest partner receivables as at June 30, 2013 (December 31, 2012 – $ 6,336).
All related party transactions are in the normal course of operations and have been measured at the agreed to exchange amounts, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties and which is comparable to those negotiated with third parties.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
As of June 30, 2013, the Company is committed under operating leases for its offices and corporate apartment in the following aggregate minimum lease payments which are shown below:
The Company is required under the Apollo Note Agreement to convey a proportionately reducible 2% overriding royalty interest in each lease acquired by Caza using proceeds advanced under this agreement. These amounts are not payable until such a time that these leases produce petroleum and natural gas revenues. See Note 8 for additional information.
7. Supplementary Information
(a) net change in non-cash working capital (six months ended):
(b) supplementary cash flow information
(c) cash and cash equivalents
The money market instruments bear interest at a rate of 0.020% as at June 30, 2013 (December 31, 2012 – 0.082%).
8. Financial Instruments
Credit Risk
Credit risk arises when a failure by counter parties to discharge their obligations could reduce the amount of future cash inflows from financial assets on hand at the consolidated statement of financial position date. A majority of the Company–s financial assets at the consolidated statement of financial position date arise from natural gas liquids and natural gas sales and the Company–s accounts receivable that are with these customers and joint interest participants in the oil and natural gas industry. Industry standard dictates that commodity sales are settled on the 25th day of the month following the month of production. The Company–s natural gas and condensate production is sold to large marketing companies. Typically, the Company–s maximum credit exposure to customers is revenue from two months of sales. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, the Company sold 66.96% and 61.6%, respectively (2012 – 77.75% and 78.11%, respectively) of its natural gas and condensates to a single purchaser. These sales were conducted on transaction terms that are typical for the sale of natural gas and condensates in the United States. In addition, when joint operations are conducted on behalf of a joint interest partner relating to capital expenditures, costs of such operations are paid for in advance to the Company by way of a cash call to the partner of the operation being conducted.
Caza management assesses quarterly whether there should be any impairment of the financial assets of the Company. At June 30, 2013, the Company had overdue accounts receivable from certain joint interest partners of $14,646 which were outstanding for greater than 60 days and $61,746 that were outstanding for greater than 90 days; management believes these amounts are collectible and not impaired. During the three month period ended June 30, 2013 the Company expensed $12,478 of uncollectable receivables. At June 30, 2013, the Company–s two largest joint interest partners represented approximately 23% and 13% of the Company–s receivable balance (June 30, 2012 – 24% and 4% respectively). The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount on the consolidated statement of financial position of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and deposits.
Other Financial Instruments
Equity Facility
The Company entered into an Equity Adjustment Agreement (the “Adjustment Agreement”) on March 5, 2013 with Global Master SPV Ltd., an investment fund managed by Yorkville Advisors Global, LP in conjunction with its Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (the “SEDA Agreement”) dated November 23, 2012 with Yorkville. Pursuant to the Adjustment Agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 3,846,154 common shares to Yorkville at a price of GBP 0.13 per share for aggregate proceeds of GBP 500,000 (US$756,451).
Under the terms of the Adjustment Agreement, if on February 28, 2014 the common share market price (determined as 95% of the average daily volume weighted average price of common shares (VWAP) during the preceding 22 trading days) is greater than GBP 0.13, then Yorkville will pay to the Company the difference multiplied by the number of New Common Shares, and if the market price is less than GBP 0.13 then the Company will pay to Yorkville the difference multiplied by the number of New Common Shares. The fair value of this derivative was calculated at the date of issuance using inputs as of that date and at June 30, 2013 using inputs as of June 30, 2013, including the share price, the strike price and the estimated volatility over the remaining term. The derivative liability is classified as a financial instrument measured at fair value though profit or loss. The fair value of the derivative liability amounting $38,187 as of June 30, 2013 has been included within current liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial position, and the change in fair value of $71,813 since the date of issuance is included in other expenses in the consolidated statement of net loss and comprehensive loss.
The Company has deposited in escrow GBP 275,000 (US$ – $418,220) as security for this contingent payment obligation, which has been recorded within restricted cash on the consolidated statements of financial position.
The outstanding balance of the notes payable relating to the SEDA Agreement as of June 30, 2013 was US$1,162,323 (net of unamortized transaction costs of US$193,047). These notes payable are classified as other financial liabilities and are measured at amortized cost.
Notes Payable
The Company also entered into a Note Purchase Agreement ( the” Note Agreement”) dated May 23, 2013 with Apollo Investment Corporation (“the Note Holder”), an investment fund managed by Apollo Investment Management, pursuant to which the Note Holder has agreed to purchase from the Company up to US$50,000,000 of its senior secured notes. The Company received US$20,000,000 at the closing of the Note Agreement (“Tranche A Apollo Note”) and the Company may draw additional advances up to US$30,000,000 until August 23, 2014, if at the time of the advance, the Company meets the specified minimum production and drilling cost requirements for previous wells drilled under the program that were financed with funding from the Note Purchase Agreement. In addition to these funds, the Company will have the ability to reinvest cash flow from program wells back into the drilling program.
In connection with the Tranche A Apollo Note, the Company incurred a total of US$1,487,412 in transaction costs (consisting of US$1,359,912 in issuance costs and US$127,500 relating to the fair value of the 2% overriding royalty conveyed at the closing of the Note Purchase Agreement). In addition, the Company also incurred structuring fees of US$440,000 in connection with the Note Purchase Agreement. The Tranche A Apollo Note is classified as other financial liabilities and is measured at amortized cost.
The outstanding balance of the Tranche A Apollo Note as at June 30, 2013 was US$18,145,650 (net of unamortized transaction costs US$1,854,350). This outstanding balance matures on May 23, 2017. The Tranche A Apollo Note bears interest at a floating rate of one-month LIBOR (with a floor of 2%) plus 10% per annum, payable monthly. In an event of default under the Note Purchase Agreement, additional interest will be payable at a default rate of 5% per annum, but only during the period of default.
The Company is required to comply with financial covenants, which are tested quarterly, providing for specified interest coverage ratios beginning in the quarter ending September 30, 2013, and asset coverage ratios and minimum production, beginning in the quarter ending March 31, 2014. Furthermore, the Company is required to maintain a limit on expenditures for general and administrative costs. Any outstanding balances in the Note Purchase Agreement may be prepaid at the option of the Company at any time at premiums that vary over time. The Note Purchase Agreement is also subject to a mandatory prepayment from the proceeds of the sale of assets and from funds received from transactions outside of the ordinary course of business. Additionally, if in any period the Company fails to comply with any financial or performance covenants, certain mandatory payments are required. Outstanding balances under the Note Purchase Agreement are secured by first-priority security interests in all of the Company–s assets.
In addition to the 2% overriding royalty interest conveyed at the closing of the Note Purchase Agreement in its properties in Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico, the Company is also required to convey a proportionately reducible 2% overriding royalty interest in each lease acquired by Caza using proceeds from the Note Purchase Agreement. These amounts are not payable until such a time that these leases produce petroleum and natural gas revenues.
Upon full repayment of Tranche A Apollo Note, the overriding royalty interests will convert to a 25% net profits interest in each property, proportionately reduced to reflect the Company–s working interest as provided in the Agreement, which will reduce to a 12.5% net profits interest at such time as the Note Holder achieves specified investment criteria pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement. The Note Agreement provides for customary events of default. Additionally, an event of default would occur upon a change of control of the Company, which consists of (i) a shareholder acquiring more than 35% of the Company–s outstanding Common Shares, (ii) a change in the composition of the board of directors by more than 1/3 during a 12-month period or (iii) a termination of service by any three of the five executive officers of the Company.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company has determined that the fair values of the financial instruments consisting of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, deposits and accounts payable are not materially different from the carrying values of such instruments reported on the consolidated statement of financial position due to their short-term nature. The fair values of other financial instruments are discussed below.
IFRS establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
The Company–s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, which are classified as fair value through profit or loss, are categorized as Level 1 financial instruments.
The Company–s notes payable issued in 2012 were categorized as Level 2 financial instruments and were recorded at fair value on issuance using a market interest rate for similar debt issued without the warrants attached. The notes payable issued pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement as described above were categorized as Level 2 financial instruments and were recorded at fair value on issuance using a market interest rate for similar debt issued without the overriding royalty interest attached.
The Company–s derivative liability as described above under “Other Financial Instruments – Equity facility” is also a Level 2 financial instrument.
All other financial assets are classified as loans or receivables and are accounted for on an amortized cost basis. All financial liabilities are classified as other liabilities. There are no financial assets on the consolidated statement of financial position that have been designated as available-for-sale. There have been no changes to the aforementioned classifications during the periods presented.
Contacts:
Caza Oil & Gas, Inc.
Michael Ford
CEO
+1 432 682 7424
Caza Oil & Gas, Inc.
John McGoldrick
Chairman
+65 9731 7471 (Singapore)
Cenkos Securities plc
Jon Fitzpatrick
+44 20 7397 8900 (London)
Cenkos Securities plc
Neil McDonald
+44 131 220 6939 (Edinburgh)
VSA Capital Limited
Andrew Raca
+44 20 3005 5004
VSA Capital Limited
Malcolm Graham-Wood
+44 20 3005 5012
VIGO Communications
Chris McMahon
+44 20 7016 9570