LONDON sidies and people are posting messages on social media using the hashtag #forestsarenotfuel to highlight the ecosystem destruction and climate chaos caused by the biomass industry.
As part of this, a group of 75 organisations including environmental and public health bodies, trade unions and community groups has sent an open letter[1] to the UK government, calling for renewable energy subsidies to be redirected away from biomass to lower carbon options such as wind and solar power. The letter was sent to the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy which oversees energy subsidies.
Biomass is classified as renewable energy under UK law and receives generous subsidies on this basis[2]; however, a growing number of scientists are speaking out against this classification, including the European Academies Scientific Advisory Council[3] and nearly 800 scientists who wrote to the EU Commission in 2018 calling for forest biomass to be removed from the renewable category.[4]
Earlier this year, a coalition of environmental advocacy groups launched Cut Carbon Not Forests, a hard-hitting campaign to expose the UK
The same coalition is also supporting a Europe-wide petition calling on policymakers and member states to end subsidies and other incentives for burning forest wood and redirect critical support to energy efficiency and true clean and renewable energy sources. The petition
Sasha Stashwick for the Cut Carbon Not Forests Campaign said:
energy. This letter is part of a groundswell of action against biomass electricity receiving public money: over 2,000 Britons have contacted their local MP already calling for the UK government to redirect these subsidies to true clean energy.
Mark Robinson for the UK Youth Climate Coalition said:
Sam Mason from PCS Union said:
“PCS fully backs this call to end the subsidies for existing biomass power stations, which underwrites the burning of wood when we should be rapidly decarbonising and protecting forests worldwide to store carbon. We also call for a publicly funded mass retrofit programme as part of a publicly owned and managed energy transition where these monies can be better directed, creating sustainable jobs and reducing energy costs.”
Anne Harris from the Coal Action Network said:
“After decades of campaigning and action by frontline communities and thousands of grassroots activists, the UK is finally moving away from coal fired power. It–s vital that public money spent on electricity production goes to genuinely renewable energy from sources which aren–t depleted as energy is generated. Drax power station still consumes coal, albeit producing less than half the amount of electricity from coal compared to biomass. Drax–s fuel sources are unsustainable.”
[1] https://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/2020/open-letter-calling-on-the-government-to-redirect-renewable-subsidies-from-biomass-burning-to-genuinely-renewable-energy/
[2] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-07-01/67583
[3] https://easac.eu/media-room/press-releases/details/emissions-trading-system-stop-perverse-climate-impact-of-biomass-by-radically-reforming-co2-accounting-rules/
[4] http://www.pfpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/UPDATE-800-signatures_Scientist- Letter-on-EU-Forest-Biomass.pdf